Edelman is the leading independent global PR firm. We’re pushing the boundaries of traditional PR, using the latest social media and digital tools to establish a new era of public engagement between organizations and their constituents. With offices in Montreal, Toronto, Calgary and Vancouver, and affiliates from coast to coast, Edelman Canada is helping to re-define 21st century communications for local and national clients across the country.

our work

Feature Image MiOsquirtCar
CAO Feature Image
Kraft Hockeyville Feature Image (UPDATED)
FeaturedImageOntarioGraphite
FeatureImage_YearintheLike
FeatureImage_AHA_2
FeatureImage_Juice+
FeatureImage_Jello
FeatureImage_EMS_MSVillage
FeatureImage_Canon
FeatureImage_Knorr
FeatureImage_MIO

our ideas

Canada, Hostile Takeover Bids and Effective Communications

A version of this article originally appeared on Edelman.com

edelman.com pic
Within the next six weeks, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) is expected to table for comment proposed changes to the rules governing unsolicited or hostile takeover bids. The new rules, first announced in September 2014, are intended to give the boards of target companies more time to respond to hostile bids by requiring that a bid remain open for at least 120 days (up from the current minimum of just 35 days).

This change is part of what has been described as a “rebalancing” of power in Canada between hostile bidders and the companies they target. It follows additional changes put forward by the CSA in 2013 that would provide boards with greater flexibility in using shareholder rights plans to defend against hostile bids.

Despite these proposed changes, Canadian companies are still more vulnerable to hostile takeovers than their U.S. counterparts, who have greater ability to reject unwanted overtures.

In Canada, a targeted company can use a rights plan, also known as a poison pill, to stall a bidder and buy time to identify a better alternative for its shareholders. Last year, Osisko Mining Corp. successfully fought off a $2.6 billion bid from Goldcorp after it was able to secure a competing offer that delivered far greater value, $3.9 billion. By comparison, the U.S. model defers to the business judgment of the target board and allows a poison pill to stay in place far longer.

Still, if a targeted Canadian company does not surface an alternative quickly, often within three months, a bidder will then apply to a provincial securities regulator to have the rights plan removed; this opens the door for shareholders to decide the fate of their company. Such was the case in 2013, when shareholders of Inmet Mining Corporation accepted First Quantum Minerals’ first and only unsolicited offer after the Inmet board was unable to surface a superior alternative after 90 days.

According to the 2014 Canadian Hostile Bid Study prepared by the law firm Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP, companies targeted with a hostile bid in Canada remain independent only 22 percent of the time (based on a review of hostile transactions above $50 million from 2006 to 2013). The same study revealed that the initial bidder (as opposed to a white knight) is successful in acquiring the target roughly 50 percent of the time.

If you’re a Canadian public company concerned about a hostile bid, you won’t like those odds.

Even with the CSA’s proposed changes, Canadian public company boards need to be mindful of hostile bid risk and prepare accordingly. This includes ensuring that they have appropriate defensive measures in place, including an approved shareholder rights plan and a team of advisors that has a depth of hostile defense experience.

Communications can also play a critical role in enabling a targeted company to respond quickly and effectively to an unsolicited bid:

  • Proactively communicate with your shareholders: It’s always good practice to know who your large holders are, what price they bought into your stock at and what their intentions and expectations are. In the context of a hostile bid, this is critical.
  • Invest in your story: Hostile takeover battles, like proxy contests, are about competing visions; it comes down to who articulates the clearest or the quickest path to value. If your shareholders understand your plan before a hostile bid surfaces, they will be more inclined to factor that into their evaluation of a bid. Conversely, if you are making your case to a large shareholder for the first time after receiving a bid, you’ve made your task considerably more difficult.
  • Anticipate your vulnerabilities: Hostile bidders will seek any advantage they can get, including attacking the merits of your strategy, as a way to make their bid seem more attractive by comparison. It’s a common “carrot and stick” approach – highlight the value on offer while casting doubt on the target’s ability to deliver on its plan over time. The more work you can do in advance to anticipate and prepare to address likely challenges, the stronger your defense will be.
  • Consider employees and other non-financial stakeholders: Hostile takeover defenses can be all consuming for a management team and board; everyone is focused on thwarting the unwanted bid and/or securing an alternative. Often lost in this fury are employees, customers, partners and other key stakeholders in the business. When preparing a hostile takeover defense, it is important to account for these groups and ensure plans are in place to keep employees engaged, customers retained and vendors and business partners onside.
  • Prepare first responses: Hostile bids seldom come out of nowhere; they are often preceded by more diplomatic overtures. That said, target companies can sometimes have only days to prepare an initial public defense. There are certain first response tools – press releases, scripts and stakeholder communications – that can be prepared in advance to help a target respond quickly and confidently to notice of an unwanted bid and, in the process, lay the foundation for a strong defense.

2014 saw the return of the hostile takeover bid in Canada, particularly in the mining industry. While the proposed changes by the CSA will make Canada less “bidder-friendly”, hostile takeover risk will remain a fact of life for many Canadian public companies. They need to plan accordingly, and shareholder communications needs to be an integral part of that process.

March 4, 2015 by in Our Ideas | 0 comments

Digital Digest #214: Expect the Unexpected

Digital Digest: What Edelman Canada is reading in digital marketing, technology and strategy. Fresh links served up weekly. This edition of Digital Digest was edited by Caroline Dunnet, Matt Beck, Charlotte Macgregor, Kaylea Forde and Erin Collett.

In 2015, we’ve seen it all. From drones to viral photographs of the bride dress, nothing is out of the ordinary, or quite frankly, weird. This week we look at a few brands who are following the ‘expect the unexpected’ notion – including pets, kids and two credible news sources.  Read more »

February 27, 2015 by in Digital Digest, Our Ideas | 0 comments

Read more of Our Ideas »

our leadership

Alan VanderMolen
John Clinton, CEO, Edelman Canada
Lisa Kimmel, General Manager, Edelman Toronto
Paul Welsh-Chief Commercial Officer-Canada-200x200
Patti Schom-Moffatt - Chief Client Officer
tristan roy 2
Jordan Doucette
Scott Evans
Kim Peacock, General Manager, Edelman Canada West
Laurie_Stretch_Jan_2013[1]
eve-featured
BobRichardson2_printsize_cropped